
We started Tuesday with a call from a nurse at the surgical facility we will be going to tomorrow to have the permanent spinal cord stimulator installed. Everything was boilerplate until she mentioned the timing; we had previously been informed that the procedure was to take place at 1400. We were now told that we had to be there at 10:30 for the procedure at 11:30. My wife had set up our dog walker to take care of him in our absence, and we had worked out when we had to get up and leave for the drive to Eulis. Now, all of this planning, in one fell swoop, was out the window, and we had to regroup. Additionally, the nurse informed us that the doctor’s office had no idea when the surgery would be scheduled and just put a number in their computer as a placeholder. This folks is the epitome of medical curve balls that seem to happen frequently. As patients, we are merely objects for doctors and their schedulers to toss around at will. In this regard, we are, as patients, rarely, if ever, asked about scheduling but are told. At this point, there seems to be no recourse, but once the fat lady sings, it will be over. Have the follow-up on Friday, and we will be rid of this stage short of complications.
By my nature, I dig words. I have been an avid reader since, like forever, even as a small boy. In the news about the Kirk saga, I ran across the words “stochastic terrorist act,” which were new to me. I understand stochastic from my advanced statistics courses at Purdue University, and terrorist acts from my military course on terrorism. But putting them together is a new discourse for me, so I did some digging with the following results:
A “stochastic terrorist act” refers to an act of violence that is statistically predictable but individually unpredictable, incited indirectly by public rhetoric rather than explicit instructions or direct coordination. Unlike traditional terrorism, stochastic terrorism involves the use of mass communication or media to demonize or vilify a group or individual in such a way that it motivates random, lone actors to commit violence.
Definition and Characteristics
- Stochastic terrorism describes a process where influencers or leaders use hostile, inflammatory, or coded language in mass media to incite others to commit violent acts against targeted groups, but the specific acts, perpetrators, and timing remain unpredictable.
- The perpetrators—often “lone wolves” without formal links to terrorist groups—are inspired by repeated public rhetoric, not direct orders.
- The link between the rhetoric and the act is statistical: increased hostile campaigns raise the probability of violent incidents, even though no particular event can be predicted in advance.
Real-World Examples
- Instances such as the 2021 US Capitol attack or hate-motivated lone wolf assaults are often analyzed as likely outcomes of stochastic terrorism: the rhetoric by influential figures creates an environment where violence is statistically probable, though each specific act is random.
- The term is frequently used in contexts involving demonization and dehumanization on social or traditional media, where “virtual incitement” is intended to provoke action, creating legal and ethical dilemmas for free speech and accountability.
Key Points
- A stochastic terrorist act is triggered not by direct command, but by the public environment of hatred and suggestion, which statistically increases the odds of violence.
- Actions can range from threats and harassment to physical violence, all provoked without explicit incitement, making perpetrators and instigators legally disconnected but causally related.
In summary, stochastic terrorism describes how public demonization or coded rhetoric by influential figures can lead to unpredictable but statistically probable acts of violence, offering the instigator plausible deniability while fostering real-world terrorism.
So now you too know what stochastic terrorism means. Hot dog!